Dev workflow and DevOps · Comparison

npm vs pnpm vs Yarn vs Bun

All four install packages from the same npm registry and read the same package.json. They differ in speed, disk use, strictness and what else comes bundled with them.

4 options · 8 questions side by side · updated

ComparenpmpnpmYarnBun
What it isThe package manager bundled with Node.jsA fast, disk-saving alternativeAn alternative first built at FacebookA JavaScript runtime with a built-in installer
SetupNone, it comes with Node.jsInstall it, or enable it with CorepackInstall it, or enable it with CorepackInstall Bun
Install speedSlower than the othersFastFastVery fast
Disk useA full copy in every projectOne shared store, linked into projectsCopies, or no node_modules with Plug'n'PlayA global cache shared by projects
StrictnessLoose: undeclared imports often workStrict: only declared packages resolveStrict in Plug'n'Play modeLoose for single apps, strict in new workspaces
Lockfilepackage-lock.jsonpnpm-lock.yamlyarn.lockbun.lock
MonoreposWorkspacesWorkspaces with strong filteringWorkspaces (Yarn introduced them)Workspaces
Watch out forHeavy node_modules foldersTools that assume a flat node_modulesClassic v1 and modern Yarn differ a lotYounger, with occasional compatibility gaps

How to choose between npm, pnpm, Yarn and Bun

  • Pick npm for zero setup and compatibility with every tool; tutorials assume it.
  • Pick pnpm for monorepos or many projects on one machine, where its shared store saves time and disk space.
  • Pick Yarn when a project already uses it, and Bun when the project runs on Bun or install speed matters most.
  • Switching later is usually a small job: delete node_modules and the old lockfile, then install with the new tool.

The options

More comparisons

Crafted in the dark. Shipped to the world.

Tell us what you are building. You get a private project space with a proposal and a line-by-line quote within a day.